Comparing Hobbes’s Social Contract Theory with the Indian Constitution


Abhipsa Baral, Amity Law School, Noida


CLICK HERE TO VIEW FULL RESEARCH PAPER



ABSTRACT


This paper will be focusing on the old philosophy- The Social Contract Theory. It will give an idea of the theory of different philosophers like Hobbes, Locke and Rosseau. It also throws an idea over the more recent social contract theory of Rawls and Gauthier. The main objective of the paper is to evaluate and compare thoughts of different philosophers on the theory. This paper deals with the concept of state of nature, civil society and general will.

Moreover, this paper also brings a comparison of Hobbes social contract theory with the Indian constitution. It differentiates how earlier as stated in Hobbes state of nature and contract people were not party to the contract and was not able to enjoy their legal rights and liberty. However Indian constitution gives more importance to the people by making them the indirect decision maker. It also provides them fundamental rights and also protect the same. In his theory he gives more importance to the ruler, making it an autocratic form of government. But in our Indian constitution significance is given to the citizen.

Hence, this paper is a basic comparison of an old philosophy and a new democratic form of government of India.



 

Journal Details
Abbreviation: NLR 

ISSN:   2582-8479 (O)

Year of Starting: 2020

Place: New Delhi, India

Accessibility: Open Access

Peer Reviewer: Double Blind

Licensing:

 

​All research articles published in NLR and are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

1200px-Open_Access_logo_PLoS_transparent.svg.png
NYAAYSHASTRA_Law_Review-removebg-preview.png
Journal Archives
Top Publications