Different Legal Theories And Implications For Obligation In Contemporary Jurisprudence


Shrishti Bajaj, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat.*



Abstract

This paper helps us to understand how different theories have implications for legal obligation and for understanding the law. We first understand the meaning of law according to different theorists and then portray a relationship with obligation. Additionally, we see how different theorists of different schools have understood legal obligation and then we conclude by saying which theory or what aspect of theory is appealing to me considering integrative jurisprudence.


 

* Pursuing L.L.B. (Hons.), (Batch of 2021-2024) from Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat.


Different Legal Theories And Implications For Obligation In Contemporary Jurisprudence
.pdf
Download PDF • 261KB


Journal Details
Abbreviation: NLR 

ISSN:   2582-8479 (O)

Year of Starting: 2020

Place: New Delhi, India

Accessibility: Open Access

Peer Reviewer: Double Blind

Licensing:

 

​All research articles published in NLR and are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

1200px-Open_Access_logo_PLoS_transparent.svg.png
NYAAYSHASTRA_Law_Review-removebg-preview.png
Journal Archives