top of page

Machine vs. Mind: The Future of AI in Legal Judgments


By B. James Jaya Raj, Assistant Professor of Law, Telangana Tribal Welfare

Residential Law College, Telangana.



Abstract


This article examines the transformational potential of artificial intelligence in judicial decisions, examining the evolving interplay between machine analysis and human reasoning. We analyze the promises and pitfalls of AI integration into judicial processes, considering ethical implications, legal challenges, and societal impact. Current AI applications in law, like legal research, automated decision-making, and predictive policing, are assessed to gauge the extent to which AI can augment or potentially replace human judgment. The limitations of current AI technologies in comprehending nuanced legal concepts, contextual factors, and ethical considerations are also investigated.


AI offers undeniable potential to revolutionize legal practice. Its capacity to process vast data, identify patterns, and predict outcomes presents unprecedented opportunities for efficiency and accuracy. AI-powered tools can automate tasks like legal research and document review, freeing lawyers for more complex work. Predictive policing algorithms can aid law enforcement in resource allocation. Moreover, AI may help mitigate biases in human decision-making, potentially promoting fairer outcomes. However, integrating AI into legal judgments raises significant challenges. One major issue is algorithmic bias, which may lead to the perpetuation of inequities via AI systems that have been trained on biased data. The "black box" nature of some AI systems raises transparency and accountability issues. Furthermore, increased reliance on AI in legal decision-making prompts fundamental questions about the role of human judgment, the nature of justice, and potential erosion of due process rights. This necessitates a framework for responsible AI implementation in law, emphasizing human oversight, ongoing evaluation, transparency, and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure AI's ethical and effective use, ultimately enhancing the fairness, efficiency, and accessibility of the judicial system.


Keywords: Legal Judgments, Bias, Transparency, Artificial Intelligence, Accountability, Human-AI Collaboration.


 


 

Comments


Journal Details
Abbreviation: NLR 

ISSN:   2582-8479 (O)

Year of Starting: 2020

Place: New Delhi, India

Accessibility: Open Access

Peer Reviewer: Double Blind

Licensing:

 

​All research articles published in NLR and are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

1200px-Open_Access_logo_PLoS_transparent.svg.png
NYAAYSHASTRA_Law_Review-removebg-preview.png
Journal Archives

 

 

Disclaimer: Any opinions and views expressed in or through the above content/ publications are those of the designated authors/ writers and do not represent the views of "Nyaayshastra Law Review." or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the NLR. Further, the Journal does not make any warranty as to the correctness or reliability of such content.

© 2020 All Rights Reserved by Nyaayshastra Law Review

Publisher: NLR Journal

Address: JP Nagar, Delhi-110053

bottom of page