top of page
  • Writer's pictureNLR Journal

Prejudice And Heterogeneity: An Overview

By Akanksha, Amity University, Jharkhand.*


Conglomerate avow have flatter a unit of worship bias. It is ordinary, if not omnipresent, the invocation for the court belief is “Plaintiff brings his action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for religious observance and practice.” Enlarged heterogeneity in the prayer’s enumeration suggests that customarily, contrasting treatment may in fact be embedded in interchange or composite bias: although cliché for “women” have somewhat evaporated. Composite bias dispenses a jetton description to the present depiction of prayers prejudice as fine or insentient. In spite of the ordinary sight conception that the more unidentical a worshipper is, the more likely she will experience bias, factual confirmation shows that vivid assert – which may report for more than the 50 per cent of united court prejudice activity – have very less chance of favourable outcome than single state. A representative of brief judgement commitment reveals that worshipper’s triumph on several claims. Getting the better of the courts unwilling to follow this superintendence needs the expansion and initiation of humanities research which set forth the subtlety cliché faced by complex suitor.


* The author is a second-year Law Student pursuing B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) from Amity University, Jharkhand.

Prejudice And Heterogeneity-An Overview-NLR
Download PDF • 232KB


Journal Details
Abbreviation: NLR 

ISSN:   2582-8479 (O)

Year of Starting: 2020

Place: New Delhi, India

Accessibility: Open Access

Peer Reviewer: Double Blind



​All research articles published in NLR and are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

Journal Archives
bottom of page